15 – 17 Precision is related to variability and defined as the closeness of agreement between measured quantity values obtained by replicate measurements on the same experimental units under specified conditions. 14Ī major challenge in QIB development is that the quantitative metrics should be measured precisely. Various QIBs are being explored for clinical usage, including tumor standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured from F 18-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET), 2 – 10 apparent diffusion coefficient measured with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, 11, 12 – 13 and dopamine transporter using single-photon emission computed tomography. A particularly important application is quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs). ![]() Quantitative imaging, i.e., the measurement and use of numerical or statistical features from medical images to facilitate clinical decision making, 1 is finding applications in many diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The bootstrap-based methodology indicated improved performance of the NGS technique with larger numbers of patient studies, as was expected, and yielded consistent results as long as data from more than 80 lesions were available for the analysis. The proposed framework provided confidence in these results, even when gold-standard data were not available. The NGS technique consistently predicted the same segmentation method as the most precise method. The developed NGS framework was applied to evaluate four methods for segmenting lesions from F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography images of patients with head-and-neck cancer on the task of precisely measuring the metabolic tumor volume. Furthermore, the NGS technique is integrated within a bootstrap-based methodology to account for patient-sampling-related uncertainty. To address these issues, we propose statistical tests that provide confidence in the underlying assumptions and in the reliability of the estimated FoMs. However, applying these techniques to patient data presents several practical difficulties including assessing the underlying assumptions, accounting for patient-sampling-related uncertainty, and assessing the reliability of the estimated FoMs. These techniques provide figures of merit (FoMs) quantifying the precision of the estimated quantitative value without requiring repeated measurements and without requiring a gold standard. I'll leave the encapsulation into a routine up to you.Recently, a class of no-gold-standard (NGS) techniques have been proposed to evaluate quantitative imaging methods using patient data. ![]() Here is my code: (I appreciate edits to make it look better) GoldenSearch := ![]() Upon investigation, I discovered that unlike the Fibonacci Search method, this method is independent of $n$ in essence, $n$ did not matter. My code works and finds the solution it just refuses to terminate until the other termination condition is met. I am attempting to code a program that executes the golden section search method, and I would like to terminate the computations after $n$ iterations, where the user decides what $n$ is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |